|
Kiss our "Democracy" Good Bye ! |
| [ http://LiberalsLikeChrist.Org/dictatorship.html ]
|
Fascism, Bush-style during a photo-op with Congressional leaders on 12 /18 /2000 (?) - The Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, College Edition, 1966, defines fascism as :
- Winston Churchill, the Prime Minister during World War II, who is said to have never lied to his people, no matter how unpopular the truth or how advantageous lying might have appeared at the time. - Thomas Jefferson It may already be too late, but time is certainly running out on America's great experiment in Democracy. It was great while it lasted! The Encyclopedia Britanica warning against "Despotism". Bush & Hitler compared.
When American citizens dared to protest George Bush's economic, environmental and military policies at a Republican party fundraiser in Portland, Oregon in August, 2002, they were prevented from getting anywhere near the hotel and instead were shot with rubber bullets and pepper spray. ! See the frightening similarities between George W. Bush and Adolf Hitler, whose rise to power was financed by George Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush, the grandfather and father of "George Herbert Walker Bush", who begat George Walker Bush : read about the long history of the Bushes and the Nazis. The following comparative chart, from Gross' Friendly Fascism, illustrates the difficulty of tossing around the term "fascism" in our current political environment without first dealing with some of the baggage attached to it. (The capitalized sub-titles other than "CLASSIC FASCISM" & "FRIENDLY FASCISM" and the side by side column format were added to the basic material authored by Dr. Gross.) |
|
CLASSIC FASCISM : |
FRIENDLY FASCISM : |
| POWER STRUCTURES: A tight Government-Big Business oligarchy with charismatic dictator or figurehead, and expansionist, scapegoating, and nationalistic ideologies. |
POWER STRUCTURES: An integrated Big business�Big Government power structure with new technocratic ideologies and more advanced arts of ruling and fooling the public. |
| REDUCTION OF OPPOSITION : Liquidation or minimalization of multiparty conflict and open subversion, with little use of democratic machinery and human rights. |
REDUCTION OF OPPOSITION : Subtle subversion, through manipulative use and control of democratic machinery, parties, and human rights. |
| ELIMINATION OF OPPOSITION : Negative sanctions through ruthless, widespread, and high-cost terror; direct action against selected scapegoats. |
ELIMINATION OF OPPOSITION : Direct terror applied through low-level violence and professionalized, low-cost escalation, with indirect terror through ethnic conflicts, multiple scapegoats, and organized disorder. |
| MEANS OF PERSUASION : Ceaseless propaganda, backed up by spies and informers, to consolidate elite support and mobilize masses. |
MEANS OF PERSUASION : Informational offensives backed by high-technology monitoring, to manage minds of elites and immobilize masses. |
| REWARDS FOR FRIENDS : Widespread benefits through more jobs, stabilized prices, domestic spoils, foreign booty, and upward mobility for the most faithful. |
REWARDS FOR FRIENDS : Rationed rewards of power and money for elites, extended professionalism, accelerated consumerism for some, and social services, conditional on the recipients' good behavior. |
| DISTRACTIONS : Anxiety relief through participatory spectacles, mass action, and genuine bloodletting. |
DISTRACTIONS : More varied relief through sex, drugs, madness, and cults, as well as alcoholism, gambling, sports, and ultra - violent drama. * |
| VIABILITY : Internal viability based on sustained, frantic, and eventually self-destructive expansion. |
VIABILITY : Internal viability based on careful expansion, system-strengthening reforms, multilevel co-optation, and mass apathy. |
|
* comment: add psychopharmaceuticals.
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Friendly_Fascism_BGross.html |
|
| Dr. Lawrence Britt, a political scientist, wrote an article about fascism which appeared in Free Inquiry magazine, a journal of humanist
thought. Dr. Britt studied the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany),
Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet
(Chile). He found the regimes all had 14 things in common, and he calls
these the identifying characteristics of fascism. The article is
"Fascism Anyone?," Lawrence Britt, Free Inquiry, Spring 2003, page 20.
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism |
|
|
Commenting on the preceding, Davidson Loehr, A Uuniversalist Unitarian clergyman wrote at http://www.uua.org/news/2004/voting/sermon_loehr.html: " This list will be familiar to students of political science. But it should be familiar to students of religion as well, for much of it mirrors the social and political agenda of religious fundamentalisms worldwide. It is both accurate and helpful for us to understand fundamentalism as religious fascism, and fascism as political fundamentalism. They both come from very primitive parts of us that have always been the default setting of our species: amity toward our in-group, enmity toward out-groups, hierarchical deference to alpha male figures, a powerful identification with our territory, and so forth. It is that brutal default setting that all civilizations have tried to raise us above, but it is always a fragile thing, civilization, and has to be achieved over and over and over again. But this is not America�s first encounter with fascism. In early 1944, the New York Times asked Vice President Henry Wallace to, as Wallace noted, �write a piece answering the following questions: What is a fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?� Vice President Wallace's answer to those questions was published in The New York Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the Axis powers of Germany and Japan. See how much you think his statements apply to our society today. �The really dangerous American fascist,� Wallace wrote, �� is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.�
When all fascisms exhibit the same social and political agendas (the 14 points listed by Britt), then it is not hard to predict where a new fascist uprising will lead. And it is not hard. The actions of fascists and the social and political effects of fascism and fundamentalism are clear and sobering. Here is some of whats coming, what will be happening in our country in the next few years: |
We Americans won't be able to say |
Contact ![]() [email protected] There is much more where this came from, at and/or
|