be Conservative, when Jesus Christ was so Revolutionary ? |
|
Only by ignoring much of What Jesus himself identified as his most important teaching ! |
|
|
|
Listen to what many Christian Conservatives in America say about Jesus and the way they depict him in art and music, and you have the image of a sweet, lily white, European, milk-toast sissy, an image that bears little resemblance to the dark-skinned, Jewish, revolutionary, "man's man" that Jesus actually was. Although he was extremely kind to the common man and woman, Jesus was extremely demanding of those who had an abundance or either riches or power, whether political or religious. He forgave and/or played down the sins of publicans, tax-collectors, prostitutes and an adulteress. He told his followers to value a poor widow's penny more than substantial contributions from the rich. And he told those who wanted to follow his leadership that what they should not do is imitate priests and levites, but instead follow the example of a heretical Samaritan. Where has this idea of Christ as an impeccably polite and diplomatic gentleman come from? Certainly not from Jesus, who instead said of himself : "Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and one's foes will be members of one's own household. Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me." Although the words of Jesus speak of inter-family conflicts, is there a single example of such conflict in the gospels? No. What we see there instead are dozens of examples of very similar conflicts between Jesus and the leading members of his religious "family", or community. If "actions speak louder than words," then Jesus showed us that the sword he came to bring was the sword of battle with people like the arrogant, pompous, money-grubbing leaders of his day, who were so similar to the "Religious Right" of our day. "I have said these things to you to keep you from stumbling. They will put you out of the synagogues. Indeed, an hour is coming when those who kill you will think that by doing so they are offering worship to God. And they will do this because they have not known the Father or me."
When pious religious leaders demanded that Jesus follow the Bible's teaching and impose the death sentence on the woman "caught in the very act of adultery," instead of condemning the adulteress, Jesus condemned her conservative prosecutors!
First, if there's one behavior that Jesus couldn't abide, it was sinners playing down their own sins while playing up someone else's. In this instance, the sin of one party (the adulteress) was being used by a second party (the even more sinful religious right hypocrites), to bring harm on a guilt-free third party (Jesus himself). Then, there's a point so obvious that Jesus may not have felt it even necessary to emphasize. But, as the father of seven daughters, I wish Jesus had asked these sanctimonious male accusers explicitly, "Was this woman alone at the time of this adultery?" And finally, there's the magnificent way in which Jesus turns the table on the hypocrites doing the accusing, and puts the judges themselves on trial : Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground. When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "Let anyone among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her." And once again he bent down and wrote on the ground. When they heard it, they went away, one by one, beginning with the elders; and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him. Jesus straightened up and said to her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?" She said, "No one, sir." And Jesus said, "Neither do I condemn you. Go your way, and from now on do not sin again."
Some people found fault with Larry Flynt's recent effort to expose
the Republican party leadership for its astounding hypocrisy.
Rather than condemn their own friends ( Republican Congressmen
Henry Hyde, Bob Livingston, Newt Gingrich, Bob Barr, Hellen Chenoweth,
and J.C. Watts, to mention just a few), whose closets are bulging
with a whole brothel full of worse adulterers than Democratic
President Clinton ever dreamed of being, they insist on condemning
the messenger. How interesting that the mainstream media,
after racing to publish everything salacious about the Democratic president that
they could lay their hands on – including the whole of Kenneth
Starr's pornographic report – has made no effort to expose
the immorality and hypocrisy of the leaders of the Republican leadership! Could it be that,
just as Jesus published the sins of the hypocrites of his day by writing
them in the dirt at his feet, God has had a hand in publicizing the
sins of today's hypocrites in a "dirty magazine"?
(Actually, this report was no more pornographic than many of the women's magazines in our supermarkets.) Far from sharing the contempt of the Pharisees for the despised "publicans" or "tax collectors" of their day, God – if we can believe Jesus – prefers such "sinners" to "holier than thou" Religious Right types, who are only good at recognizing the sins of others:
He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were
were righteous and regarded others with contempt:
How refreshing it will be on the day when God makes his preferences known, if he chooses those on the left to be with him in paradise, rather than those on the right! Far from displaying the judgmentalism of Christian Conservatives, who are forever looking for people other than themselves to condemn for any number of sins, real or imagined, Jesus was slow to condemn himself, and exemplified liberalism instead: "Do not judge, and you will not be judged; do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven; give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, will be put into your lap; for the measure you give will be the measure you get back."
Although this passage is commonly called "the parable of the prodigal son", that's only a title added by editors to verses that had no title in the original. Since the point of this story, however, is to describe the divine father, I think a much better title would be one that highlights the father's behavior rather the son's. And since its the father's liberality that is emphasized, what better title could there be than "the parable of the liberal father"? (And note that it's not the wayward son who is portrayed badly in this story of Jesus', it's the resentful conservative son!
"A man had two sons. When the younger told his father,
'I want my share of your estate now, instead of waiting
until you die!' his father agreed to divide his wealth
between his sons. "A few days later this younger son
packed all his belongings and took a trip to a distant land,
and there wasted all his money on parties and prostitutes.
About the time his money was gone a great famine swept
over the land, and he began to starve. He persuaded a local
farmer to hire him to feed his pigs. The boy became so hungry
that even the pods he was feeding the swine looked good to him.
And no one gave him anything. "What do you think? A man had two sons; he went to the first and said, 'Son, go and work in the vineyard today.' He answered, 'I will not'; but later he changed his mind and went. The father went to the second and said the same; and he answered, 'I go, sir'; but he did not go. which of the two did the will of his father?" They said, "The first." Jesus said to them, "Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are going into the kingdom of god ahead of you.
When Jesus spoke those words from the cross,
was he praying for the religious leaders who had
been working for months, if not years, for just such
an outcome? Or was he simply praying for the
misinformed "little people" following the orders of
higher ups? When it came to those with whom
he had done battle for most of his public life,
Jesus was anything but forgiving.
Open the Bible ![]() to see for yourself. To see just how sinister the so-called "Christian Coalition" really is look at it through the eyes of someone who saw it from inside "the inner sanctum", read the outstanding expose of this monstrous fraud : The Hijacking of the Christian Church, published on the Religious Freedom Coalition of the SouthEast web site.
"The Christian who is pure and without fault, from God the Father's
point of view, is the one who takes care of orphans and
widows in their distress, and who remains true to the Lord – not soiled and dirtied by his
contacts with the world. Dear brothers, how can you claim that
you belong to the Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, if
you show favoritism to rich people and look down on poor people?
If a man comes into your church dressed in expensive clothes and with
valuable gold rings on his fingers, and at the same moment another
man comes in who is poor and dressed in thread-bare clothes, and you
make a lot of fuss over the rich man and give him the best seat in the
house and say to the poor man, "You can stand over there if you
like or else sit on the floor" – well, judging
a man by his wealth shows that you are guided by wrong motives.
"You will be judged on whether or not you are doing what
Christ wants you to. So watch what you do and what you
think; for there will be no mercy to those who have shown no mercy.
But if you have been merciful, then God's mercy toward
you will win out over his judgment against you. Dear
brothers, what's the use of saying that you have faith and are
Christians if you aren't proving it by helping others?
Will that kind of faith save anyone?
"Look here, you rich men, now is the time to cry and groan with anguished grief because of all the terrible troubles ahead of you. Your wealth is even now rotting away, and your fine clothes are becoming mere moth-eaten rags. The value of your gold and silver is dropping fast, yet it will stand as evidence against you and eat your flesh like fire. That is what you have stored up for yourselves to receive on that coming day of judgment. For listen! Hear the cries of the field workers whom you have cheated of their pay. Their cries have reached the ears of the Lord of Hosts. You have spent your years here on earth having fun, satisfying your every whim, and now your fat hearts are ready for the slaughter. You have condemned and killed good men who had no power to defend themselves against you." Conservatives may love to quote some verses from John, but have you ever heard them quote these? "If someone who is supposed to be a Christian has money enough to live
well, and sees a brother in need and won't help him – how can God's love
be within him? Little children, let us stop just saying
we love people; let us really love them, and show it by our actions. Then
we will know for sure, by our actions, that we are on God's side, and our
consciences will be clear, even when we stand before the Lord.
Don't be fooled by the many times Christian Conservatives mention the name of "Jesus" or "Christ". Pay close attention and you will find that they largely ignore what Christ taught – which was largely about the necessity of devoting ones life to doing good deeds for the benefit of those in need of them and to thereby please God and achieve eternal life. – Instead they repeat endlessly what Paul of Tarsus taught ( i.e. that Jesus supposedly intended to save us by faith alone ) – which makes just about everything Jesus or anybody else says about works superfluous or even objectionable. – This is the heart of the problem with "Christian Conservatism", and so we dedicate an extensive web page to the extremely important issue of Paul's teaching about faith vs. Christ's teaching about works. But there is a lot more of Paul's teaching that they promote in lieu of the teaching and example of Jesus, as we show in their own words at PaulvsAll.html. "Christian Republicans" insist that "charity" is a private matter, best left to churches, and that it is wrong for any government to tax the rich in order to help the poor. According to them, "market forces" and the "profit-motive" – not morality, or religion – should govern in the public square. That's straight out of the gospel according to the G.O.P., and the very opposite of what the Hebrew and the Christian Scriptures teaches! Here is what the Bible and Jesus teach about GOD vs. Mammon (Greed) and here is why so few Christian priests or preachers teach what Jesus taught about the lust for money. "Christian Conservatives" often insist that they are in possession of "the absolute truth" and they despise Liberals for promoting what they call "moral relativism".
"The Last Christian died on the cross" The German philosopher, Nietzsche, "We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another." "Man created God in his image." - John Allen "If Christ were here there is one thing he would not be – a Christian." Had Hitler not persuaded the Roman Catholic and the Lutheran churches to "mind their own (ecclesiastical) business, and to stay out of "secular" matters, the mass murder of 10 million Jews, Jehovah witnesses, handicapped people, Liberals and homosexuals could never have succeeded. See " the role played by Catholic Church's leadership in the Jewish Holocaust" How many Bible believers know that modern translations, such as the NRSV below, have replaced the term "liberal", which was used in the King James version, with the term "noble" ? "Behold, a king shall reign in righteousness, and princes shall rule in judgment. . . . 5 The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. For the vile person will speak villainy, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the LORD, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail. The instruments also of the churl are evil: he deviseth wicked devices to destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy speaketh right. 8 But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand. " " The triumph of Conservatism in America these days is perhaps most visible in the way we are throwing more of our "sinners" in prison than any other country in the world, civilized or not. And nowhere is the treatment of those in prison nearly as cruel and un-Christian as it is in the "Bible Belt" states. Instead of visiting those in prison, as Jesus taught, Republicans seem intent on making sure that as many families as possible are torn apart, with as many children as possible deprived of fathers and mothers who are behind bars, often far from their families. |
|
"One of my all time favorite Fox News moments was on the Hannity & Colmes show. The hosts were talking about the book which Alan Colmes had written ("Red, White and Liberal") in which there is a chapter entitled, "Jesus was a liberal". This night, the Conservative preacher, Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham, was the guest. Turning to the preacher, Hannity, with a sneer & smirk, told Graham about the chapter in Colmes' book. Expecting Graham to sneer along with him, Hannity asked what Graham thought about that.... Graham replied (to Hannity's horror) that he'd have to agree with Colmes." – D103486 – Here is an outstanding editorial which the Amarillo Globe News had the good sense to publish on Jan. 29 ,2003: http://www.amarillonet.com/stories/012903/opi_aprayer.shtml: |
||||
| Jesus Wouldn't Have a Prayer Among the Far Right
The Trinity of Robertson, Falwell and Swaggart, the American "Axis of Good", has been busy preaching to its flocks on the evils of the religion of Islam.
Jesus was wandering around Jerusalem when He decided that He really needed a new robe. After looking around for a while, He saw a sign for "Finkelstein, the Tailor". So, He went in and made the necessary arrangements to have Finkelstein prepare a new robe for Him. A few days later, when the robe was finished, Jesus tried it on and it was a perfect fit! He asked how much He owed. Finkelstein brushed him off: 'No, no,no, for the Son of God ? There's no charge! However, may I ask for a small favor? Whenever you give a sermon, perhaps you could just mention that I made your nice new robe?'
[ source unknown ]
a frequent contributor to the Other Opinion page." Here is another excellent article, Wasn't Jesus A Liberal? by a Christian evangelical clergyman, Gary Vance, from Loretto, TN. but they appear to support what we see in Jesus : Jesus vs. Guns :
I once saw a gun lover's site pull the following words of Jesus out of their context to support his position: " the one who has no sword must sell his cloak and buy one." " Then Jesus said to him, "Put your sword back into its place; for all who take the sword will perish by the sword ." And who was the fulfilment of this prophecy, if not Jesus:"For out of Zion shall go forth instruction, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. He shall judge between the nations, and shall arbitrate for many peoples; they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more." the "New Covenant" prophesied by Jeremiah? {Chapter 31:31-34 NIV}
"The time is coming," declares the Lord, "when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their forefathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt [i.e., the covenant of the Law, the Ten Commandments], because they broke my covenant, though I was a husband to them," declares the Lord. This is the way the Greek philosopher, Aristides, described to the pagan Roman Emperor Hadrian the second century Christians whom he had observed ( in his Apology 15,16; A.D. 137 ). "It is the Christians, O Emperor, . . . who beyond all the nations of the earth have found the truth: for they know God as Creator and Maker of all things, and they worship no other god beside Him; for they have His commandments graven on their hearts, and these they keep in expectation of the world to come. Whatsoever they would should not be done unto them, they do not to another. . . If they see a stranger they bring him under their roof, and rejoice over him, as over a brother, for they call not one another brethren after the flesh, but after the spirit. They are ready for Christ's sake to give up their own lives; for His commandments they securely keep, living holy and righteous lives, according as the Lord their God hath commanded them, giving thanks to Him at all hours, over all their food and drink, and the rest of their good things." [ from http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/APO_ARN/ARISTIDES_APOLOGY_OF.html ]Now it is clear why the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. called Jesus of Nazareth "one of history's most famous Liberals". "In his book Edith the Good, Spencer Marsh's implicit thesis was that Edith Bunker's every reflexive reaction to any situation was what the writers thought Jesus' reaction would be. Marsh had it right; that is the way Edith was conceived. . . Everything tells me that the world would be an exquisite place to live if we were all able to respond to life as Jesus did." Norman Lear (a sceptical but spiritual Jew.)
with the "hippie" part, here's a video that does a good job of showing how liberal Jesus was : |
|
|
Contact ![]() Ray@LiberalsLikeChrist.Org There is much more where this came from at See why you may already be one of us ! |